If a child kills the punishment should be the same: up to the victim. There are no "children's rights," nor should their be special protection for them. They don't get protection until they start working and bringing home the bread.
Capital punishment is just an example of how egregious modern-day punishment is: it exists for some unknown society. It in no way is accountable to the person who is damaged and instead punishes society as a whole, as Icepick pointed out: It costs more to fry a man than to fry him some eggs for...
Not once (once!) did that woman distraught over her man's game playing (with that vacuous look on her face) look at her man when he was talking. And she's whinging about her man not taking an interest in her! Why doesn't she play games with him? I bet she'd watch a movie with him, or listen to a...
Excusing the ad hominem attack, that is quite a shaky generalization, and definitely quite a slippery slope. Are you a soothsayer? what's your record for predicting my future, let alone any future? Is your statement about my creations based on any historical fact that people who refuse to...
Let's not take things I say and remove key words and insert your words in an attempt to validate your argument. Protection by the law does not equate to making money and profit. No one has a right to a profit. Your creation of something does not entitle you to having someone buy it, which is...
How so? Do inventors sit around thinking, "I wish I could create such-and-such, but I'm frankly afraid of doing so because I can't get legal protection?"
Hardly! More likely, people sit around thinking, "I wish I could create such-and-such, but I'm frankly afraid of doing so because of legal...
Why should any written presentation attempt to emulate, or fully emulate, an oral presentation?
It cannot!
And because it cannot, why should this be viewed pejoratively?
It shouldnot!
This might be because you never defined what intellectual property is, and how rights in intellectual property are determined.
Come now: What's so offensive about arguing on the Internet? Why does the mere location of an argument change an intellectual exchange?
I think you underestimate...
No one is claiming no regulation. Property rights are regulation. Please do not put words in my mouth. For someone so concerned about the protection against deception you sure are being deceptive. Furthermore, the rich bankers you mention did not achieve their dominance on their guile alone...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.